All five bills we opposed failed.
That includes the proposed middle-housing rollback and two homelessness bills that needed stronger governance, privacy, or funding safeguards.
2026 Arizona legislative session recap
The scale of the work
We screened 405 bills for housing impact and tracked 31 closely. We supported seven, opposed five, and sought an amendment to one.
Thirteen is the number of bills on which the Coalition took an official position. It is not the number we reviewed, discussed with partners, monitored, or worked to improve.
Formal engagement requires more than registering support or opposition. Staff must read the bill and every amendment, test the impact with members and people closest to the issue, align with partners, meet with sponsors and committee members, prepare testimony and Request to Speak activity, count votes, and follow the bill through both chambers and the budget process. That level of work can last for months.
We focused it where a bill directly affected our priorities and Coalition involvement could change the outcome. A Coalition position carries weight only when it is selective and backed by real work. The 55 laws shown above were among the 405 bills screened; they passed without a formal Coalition position.
What the work looked like
The session in three parts
Arizona protected some existing policy, advanced several ideas, and enacted related laws. It did not adopt the major housing production or prevention tools in the Coalition’s 2026 agenda.
That includes the proposed middle-housing rollback and two homelessness bills that needed stronger governance, privacy, or funding safeguards.
One of seven supported bills became law. Rural LIHTC crossed the House, rental assistance cleared a committee, and statewide homelessness coordination received serious debate.
Most were not Coalition priorities or formal positions. Together, they show activity around courts, reentry, veterans, behavioral health, local government, and housing stability.
Beyond our formal positions
Inclusion here does not mean the Coalition endorsed every provision. These examples show how housing stability intersects with other systems.
Creates a clearer court process for tenants to prove an eviction judgment was paid when a landlord does not respond.
Allows a one-time extension of transition services for eligible people who need additional treatment or intervention before release.
Allows certain petty-offense records to be sealed, reducing a barrier that can follow people into housing and employment.
Allows county attorneys to create treatment-focused diversion programs for eligible military members and veterans.
One housing system. Three connected parts.
Arizona needs to prevent avoidable housing loss, respond well when people become homeless, and build and preserve homes people can afford. All three are necessary.
Prevent eviction when a short-term intervention can stabilize a household. Make sure people leaving foster care, corrections, hospitals, behavioral health care, or treatment have somewhere safe to go.
Coordinate outreach, shelter, diversion, services, data, and housing so people get the help they need and do not return to homelessness.
Use public funds carefully to bring in private capital, lower avoidable costs, and preserve existing affordable homes.
Bills of consequence
Choose a bill to see the result, the policy questions, what we did, and what comes next.
HB 2804
HB 2804 passed the House. Thirty-one rural mayors and local officials asked state leaders to include it in the budget. The Senate did not hold a hearing, and the credit was left out of the final deal.
This was the furthest a state housing credit had advanced in three years. It also showed that rural communities are prepared to lead on housing supply.
Organized rural voices, met with lawmakers, testified, pursued budget inclusion, and supplied members and media with practical policy context.
Keep rural officials at the center. Add employers and economic-development leaders. Build a Senate path before the session starts.